Yes! I agree with this wholeheartedly. It feels as though we have forgotten that faith without works is dead and that you can’t really trust the “plan” if you’re not helping execute it in the ways which are entrusted to you as a person born into this world. I’ve noticed that when I too held these perspectives I could describe myself as what you called “spiritually lazy” I wouldn’t do much and sometimes even actively avoid/ ignore the voice in me to get up and do something all in the name of me “trusting the plan” and that “everything works for my good”. lol. There’s nothing good about passive spirituality - there’s personal responsibility within spiritual belief/ faith. Thank you for pointing this out.
HAARP IS BREAKING DOWN THE EARTHS MAGNATISM... WHAT YOU ARE SAYING MAKES PERFECT SENSE. THANK YOU FOR EXPLAINING . MY INTUITION WAS HAVING ISSUES WITH ALL THE MIXED MESSAGES. BEING PUT OUT FROM ALL THESE GROUPS.
Ok, so, as always love your work and you ability/desire to shine a light on interesting areas especially the religious/spiritual and there’s no doubt the New Age Movement requires/deserves some discerning enquiry. And yes the whole 5D ascension, raising your vibration, unconditional love etc.are ideas that can appear frustratingly “woo woo” at times. But could they simply be more conceptual? Rather than being literal isn’t raising your vibration more about “rising above” our everyday fears and frustrations, stresses and petty machinations. Rather than Unconditional love meaning you don’t have an issue with someone breaking into your home, it surely means you can empathise, understand and have compassion, even when someone is doing you harm. It means you can recognise others needs above your own which to be fair isn’t that what all the great spiritual teachers espoused? And as for Blavatsky and Steiner they were leaders of their time not every day folk trying to make sense of their world with a spiritual concept that works for them, so of course the average New Ager couldn’t sit in a room and debate Rudolf Steiner. And again the idea that if something is not in your reality it doesn’t exist is more conceptual and speaks to the idea that aspects of this realm only affect us if we participate in them. It has nothing to do with ignoring suffering. Most people are aware of what's going on in Gaza for instance but how do we know? News? Instagram? Til Tok? Substack? What we “know” isn’t reality. Unless you’ve been there and experienced it actually we know next to nothing about it. That doesn’t mean we are ignoring it but the “truth” is most of us only participate in suffering that is local “tangible” to us. And finally Objective Truth. What is this One Objective Truth you speak of? The idea that if there is objective truth their cant be subjective truth is nonsense. All that we experience is within us. Whatever we experience is true to us. That doesn’t deny or exclude objective reality it merely explains that how we experience reality is unique to us and is within us. Are there objective truths that we can all experience? Sure. Do we all experience them in the exact same way. I am pushing back on some of your arguments not because I am an apologist for the New Age movement (and its highly possible it has been hijacked by this with a larger agenda) but because as I said I love your work but for your work to remain relevant it is important that we retain trust in your views. The arguments you use here to discredit the movement appear ill-conceived and from all the great content you create my sense is that on this particular line of debate you could certainly do better. I hope this feedback is received in the positive and I look forward to more greta content to come.
Please make a video about Deja vu
Got you
Thank you
I live in Deja vu it’s pretty bad and I just need a deeper understanding of it
MARK! THANK YOU! 🙏🏻 The more you can deconstruct like this the better we all can help each other out! Thank you for doing this work 🌟
Yes! I agree with this wholeheartedly. It feels as though we have forgotten that faith without works is dead and that you can’t really trust the “plan” if you’re not helping execute it in the ways which are entrusted to you as a person born into this world. I’ve noticed that when I too held these perspectives I could describe myself as what you called “spiritually lazy” I wouldn’t do much and sometimes even actively avoid/ ignore the voice in me to get up and do something all in the name of me “trusting the plan” and that “everything works for my good”. lol. There’s nothing good about passive spirituality - there’s personal responsibility within spiritual belief/ faith. Thank you for pointing this out.
HAARP IS BREAKING DOWN THE EARTHS MAGNATISM... WHAT YOU ARE SAYING MAKES PERFECT SENSE. THANK YOU FOR EXPLAINING . MY INTUITION WAS HAVING ISSUES WITH ALL THE MIXED MESSAGES. BEING PUT OUT FROM ALL THESE GROUPS.
Ok, so, as always love your work and you ability/desire to shine a light on interesting areas especially the religious/spiritual and there’s no doubt the New Age Movement requires/deserves some discerning enquiry. And yes the whole 5D ascension, raising your vibration, unconditional love etc.are ideas that can appear frustratingly “woo woo” at times. But could they simply be more conceptual? Rather than being literal isn’t raising your vibration more about “rising above” our everyday fears and frustrations, stresses and petty machinations. Rather than Unconditional love meaning you don’t have an issue with someone breaking into your home, it surely means you can empathise, understand and have compassion, even when someone is doing you harm. It means you can recognise others needs above your own which to be fair isn’t that what all the great spiritual teachers espoused? And as for Blavatsky and Steiner they were leaders of their time not every day folk trying to make sense of their world with a spiritual concept that works for them, so of course the average New Ager couldn’t sit in a room and debate Rudolf Steiner. And again the idea that if something is not in your reality it doesn’t exist is more conceptual and speaks to the idea that aspects of this realm only affect us if we participate in them. It has nothing to do with ignoring suffering. Most people are aware of what's going on in Gaza for instance but how do we know? News? Instagram? Til Tok? Substack? What we “know” isn’t reality. Unless you’ve been there and experienced it actually we know next to nothing about it. That doesn’t mean we are ignoring it but the “truth” is most of us only participate in suffering that is local “tangible” to us. And finally Objective Truth. What is this One Objective Truth you speak of? The idea that if there is objective truth their cant be subjective truth is nonsense. All that we experience is within us. Whatever we experience is true to us. That doesn’t deny or exclude objective reality it merely explains that how we experience reality is unique to us and is within us. Are there objective truths that we can all experience? Sure. Do we all experience them in the exact same way. I am pushing back on some of your arguments not because I am an apologist for the New Age movement (and its highly possible it has been hijacked by this with a larger agenda) but because as I said I love your work but for your work to remain relevant it is important that we retain trust in your views. The arguments you use here to discredit the movement appear ill-conceived and from all the great content you create my sense is that on this particular line of debate you could certainly do better. I hope this feedback is received in the positive and I look forward to more greta content to come.
Wow the Schuman resonance thing, did not know that :O!!!