Thank you for all your information. I was wondering if you can cover mental illness and spirituality. Why would a higher power allow such a horror upon us.? Please share your thoughts and thank you.
Please take all the time you need to re-group and rest. I retired early to do my best to get out of the game. If it wasn't for my lack of funds, I would join. $8 doesn't seem like much but .....
You think beyond the critical thinking realm of our current dimension. Thankfully so. Keep up the good works. You cause me to actually stop and parse the meanings of sentiments easily taken for granted. The victim roles have never felt correct to me. Correct interpretation from original language goes a long way in conveying truth. Thank you.
magine if the majority of the people acted with mercy, courage, kindness, compassion, strength, bravery and love; ==we will be able to really build each other up .
Hi there, thank you this is Geoff in St Paul MN and I am a handicap person that is pretty much housebound so I don’t have the money to pay a subscription so thank you very much. I would like to read your manuals. That’ll be cool.
It is a known fact that the members of the US Congress and the State Legislatures do not read, evaluate or debate any of the particulars of the Legislation they vote on. They cannot read or debate the issues because the Bills approach 2000 pages each. And there are one hundred new bills for them to vote on every day they are in session.
During the 1992 Presidential campaign, Ross Perot called attention to this insanity with a diplomatic observation that "a general lack of accountability among elected officials and those in the bureaucracy was the one specific reason that the people in America suffered".
Mr. Perot then suggested that the best and perhaps only way to make government officials accountable was to include the citizens in the decision-making process - every hour, every day.
He went on to note that this can easily be done with computers and called the proposed mechanism
THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL.
With this computer program every interested citizen can indicate whether or not they agree or disagree with every line item of every law, policy and program on the books or that was being advanced. It can be used at every level of government and in every jurisdiction.
To prevent chaos the basic law, our Constitution and Bill of Rights would be exempt from review.
Mr. Perot speculated that the Founding Fathers would probably have done the same had the technology been available. He referred to it as the Fourth Branch of government; The Citizens Branch / The Electronic Townhall.
If the government is truly of the people, by the people and for the people then what better way is there to perfect every section of the various laws and policies that do effect each and every one of us every single day?
It would not be difficult to expect at least 500 thousand qualified citizens, per congressional district, to read four pages of law or proposed law and get their Ratify or Annual input every day the congress is in session. The results could be aggregated, made known and we would all be better off.
The program would even allow a citizen to go back and change their vote as they matured. And when a super majority is reached the law/proposed law is either ratified or annulled by immediate recognition of the enforcement mechanisms.
With tens of millions of laws and tens of thousands of taxes there is plenty of work to be done.
According to Mr. Perot, this, the harnessed experience and the combined intelligence of hundreds of thousands or even millions of citizens focused like a laser light on the real issues, will, as surely as night follows the day, perfect every law in our country and eventually it will right every wrong.
Mr. Perot publicly announced his intention to give the fourth branch of government to the people in America if he was elected President.
But this attempt to empower our humanity was so far removed from the business-as-usual-two-party-system that the talking heads and trolls yelled out that Mr. Perot was trying to destroy our Constitution, our government and our way of life.
The ELECTONIC TOWNHALL was denounced as unworkable.
How would the poor participate?
How would fraud be prevented?
What about those who do not know how to use a computer?
In a final act of desperation, the control freaks claimed that letting the average citizen to pass judgment on the individual pieces of public law would lead to chaos and pandemonium.
But we all know the truth: only the concerned will bother to participate.
The media was so intensely negative towards the ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL that Mr. Perot was forced to stop talking about it, but he never withdrew it from his platform.
It’s now been thirty-two years since the proposal.
No other person of national reputation or significant influence has picked up the idea. BUT the big two political parties regularly stage "townhall meetings" where they talk of "reform" and "returning power to the people" and try to link themselves to the empowering part of the idea without adding to its manifestation.
And still we suffer in the hopeless loop of: "candidates with a sense of morality and respect for the Constitution who understand true brotherhood, justice and democracy and who will do the right thing for us each and every time, trust me".
While we cannot make light of sincere individuals who get into public office, we must acknowledge the fact that regardless of who has been elected to public office the problems in our government get more complicated and our people continue to suffer.
Could we possibly admit that our national situation, now being made global, is far too complicated for the President and the 535 elected members of the legislature to manage in our best interests?
You, the person reading this know some of the things we need.
Your friends, our fellow countrymen have their solutions too.
The only way to organize the workable ideas is to create a device that will enable all of us to simultaneously contribute our best thinking and most benevolent experience towards solving our most complicated problems.
That device is THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL and the place to begin is with our existing laws.
How long should a legally arrived, non-working, elderly immigrant have to wait before the taxpayers of the host country start paying them social security?
According to Ross Perot, this is the only way forward.
# 1. Who gets to vote in the: general election?
a. citizens only - Yes No
b. natural born citizens only - Yes No
c. natural born citizens with four natural born grandparents - Yes No
d. naturalized citizens (legal immigrants) - Yes No
e. legal immigrants not yet naturalized - Yes No
f. anyone with a drivers license – Yes - No
# 2. Ages of Voter
g. minimum18 years
h. minimum 21 years
i. minimum 25 years
j. minimum 30 years
k. minimum 33 years
l. minimum 35 years
# 3. Sex of Voter
a. Male – Yes - No
b. Female – Yes - No
c. Non – Binanry - Yes - No
d. Transgender - Yes - No
# 4. Competence of Voter
e. property owners net value over $50,000 - Yes - No
f. property owners net value over $250,000 - Yes - No
g. tax exempt persons – Yes - No
h. those receiving welfare / food stamps – Yes - No
i. those with unpaid child support obligations - Yes - No
j. those receiving WIC – Yes - No
k. those receiving Section 8 – Yes - No
l. those working for government bureaucracies – Yes - No
m. those that will pay a $5000 poll tax - Yes - No
n. those that have paid a minimum of $5000 per year of tax for their combined jurisdictions in excess of any received via SS, Medicare, Medicaid, ATFWDC - Yes - No
# 5. Genetic presence of Voter
a. Male without children – Yes - No
b. Male with children – Yes - No
c. Male with children plural vote – Yes - No
d. Female without children – Yes - No
e. Female with children – Yes - No
f. Female with children plural vote – Yes - No
g. Only married males with children, never divorced can vote. – Yes - No
# 6. Who should be trusted with the responsibility and power of public
office?
a. Only those authorized to vote in the general election - Yes No
b. Male without children – Yes - No
c. Male with children – Yes - No
d. Female without children – Yes - No
e. Female with children – Yes - No
f. Only married males with children, never divorced can hold public office – Yes - No
I completely resonate with your take on the nature of reality. It’s something I’ve always sensed—that what we perceive as "reality" often isn’t purely objective, but deeply intertwined with collective agreement. This aligns closely with social constructivism, the idea that much of what we accept as reality is built through shared understanding rather than absolute truths.
Take something as simple as a chair. We all agree it’s a wooden brown chair because it fits the definition we’ve collectively upheld across generations. Our ancestors, our parents, even our friends and neighbors see it the same way, reinforcing the perception that this is what a "chair" is. Over time, this shared belief gives the object a sense of permanence and reality.
But what if we all agreed that the chair had magical properties, like the ability to float? If enough people believed it, that belief could reshape how the chair is perceived and experienced. This speaks to the power of collective consciousness—how shared beliefs can influence reality. Philosophers like Kant have explored how perception shapes our understanding of the world, and many metaphysical beliefs suggest that our thoughts and collective will have the power to manifest changes in reality.
It makes me wonder: is this why so many systems in society seem designed to divide us? Could it be that the potential of collective unity is what "they" fear the most? Perhaps those who benefit from maintaining the status quo don’t want us to realize how malleable reality could be if we all aligned on new possibilities.
Imagine the transformative power of a united collective consciousness. Could we reshape the world just as cultural narratives shape history or scientific paradigms shift over time? It’s a profound idea—one that could change everything.
IF any teaching does not feel "right" with you...leave it. It is not for you at this time. If an idea resonates with you then by all means you should contemplate it before you adopt it without due consideration. Be a critical thinker.
Thank you for all your information. I was wondering if you can cover mental illness and spirituality. Why would a higher power allow such a horror upon us.? Please share your thoughts and thank you.
I'd love to. This is a great idea. Expect that video soon.
Please take all the time you need to re-group and rest. I retired early to do my best to get out of the game. If it wasn't for my lack of funds, I would join. $8 doesn't seem like much but .....
take care and thank you for being you
You think beyond the critical thinking realm of our current dimension. Thankfully so. Keep up the good works. You cause me to actually stop and parse the meanings of sentiments easily taken for granted. The victim roles have never felt correct to me. Correct interpretation from original language goes a long way in conveying truth. Thank you.
I'm glad this helped. <3
u should do a collab with stefan molyneux
That would be pretty cool. I haven’t seen his stuff recently. What’s he up to?
he answers questions from callers and talks philosophy
So important 🙏🏼
<3
Thank you so much 💓
You are very welcome
magine if the majority of the people acted with mercy, courage, kindness, compassion, strength, bravery and love; ==we will be able to really build each other up .
Hi there, thank you this is Geoff in St Paul MN and I am a handicap person that is pretty much housebound so I don’t have the money to pay a subscription so thank you very much. I would like to read your manuals. That’ll be cool.
homeless can adopt a pet gives them something to care about
It is a known fact that the members of the US Congress and the State Legislatures do not read, evaluate or debate any of the particulars of the Legislation they vote on. They cannot read or debate the issues because the Bills approach 2000 pages each. And there are one hundred new bills for them to vote on every day they are in session.
During the 1992 Presidential campaign, Ross Perot called attention to this insanity with a diplomatic observation that "a general lack of accountability among elected officials and those in the bureaucracy was the one specific reason that the people in America suffered".
Mr. Perot then suggested that the best and perhaps only way to make government officials accountable was to include the citizens in the decision-making process - every hour, every day.
He went on to note that this can easily be done with computers and called the proposed mechanism
THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL.
With this computer program every interested citizen can indicate whether or not they agree or disagree with every line item of every law, policy and program on the books or that was being advanced. It can be used at every level of government and in every jurisdiction.
To prevent chaos the basic law, our Constitution and Bill of Rights would be exempt from review.
Mr. Perot speculated that the Founding Fathers would probably have done the same had the technology been available. He referred to it as the Fourth Branch of government; The Citizens Branch / The Electronic Townhall.
If the government is truly of the people, by the people and for the people then what better way is there to perfect every section of the various laws and policies that do effect each and every one of us every single day?
It would not be difficult to expect at least 500 thousand qualified citizens, per congressional district, to read four pages of law or proposed law and get their Ratify or Annual input every day the congress is in session. The results could be aggregated, made known and we would all be better off.
The program would even allow a citizen to go back and change their vote as they matured. And when a super majority is reached the law/proposed law is either ratified or annulled by immediate recognition of the enforcement mechanisms.
With tens of millions of laws and tens of thousands of taxes there is plenty of work to be done.
According to Mr. Perot, this, the harnessed experience and the combined intelligence of hundreds of thousands or even millions of citizens focused like a laser light on the real issues, will, as surely as night follows the day, perfect every law in our country and eventually it will right every wrong.
Mr. Perot publicly announced his intention to give the fourth branch of government to the people in America if he was elected President.
But this attempt to empower our humanity was so far removed from the business-as-usual-two-party-system that the talking heads and trolls yelled out that Mr. Perot was trying to destroy our Constitution, our government and our way of life.
The ELECTONIC TOWNHALL was denounced as unworkable.
How would the poor participate?
How would fraud be prevented?
What about those who do not know how to use a computer?
In a final act of desperation, the control freaks claimed that letting the average citizen to pass judgment on the individual pieces of public law would lead to chaos and pandemonium.
But we all know the truth: only the concerned will bother to participate.
The media was so intensely negative towards the ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL that Mr. Perot was forced to stop talking about it, but he never withdrew it from his platform.
It’s now been thirty-two years since the proposal.
No other person of national reputation or significant influence has picked up the idea. BUT the big two political parties regularly stage "townhall meetings" where they talk of "reform" and "returning power to the people" and try to link themselves to the empowering part of the idea without adding to its manifestation.
And still we suffer in the hopeless loop of: "candidates with a sense of morality and respect for the Constitution who understand true brotherhood, justice and democracy and who will do the right thing for us each and every time, trust me".
While we cannot make light of sincere individuals who get into public office, we must acknowledge the fact that regardless of who has been elected to public office the problems in our government get more complicated and our people continue to suffer.
Could we possibly admit that our national situation, now being made global, is far too complicated for the President and the 535 elected members of the legislature to manage in our best interests?
You, the person reading this know some of the things we need.
Your friends, our fellow countrymen have their solutions too.
The only way to organize the workable ideas is to create a device that will enable all of us to simultaneously contribute our best thinking and most benevolent experience towards solving our most complicated problems.
That device is THE ELECTRONIC TOWNHALL and the place to begin is with our existing laws.
How long should a legally arrived, non-working, elderly immigrant have to wait before the taxpayers of the host country start paying them social security?
According to Ross Perot, this is the only way forward.
# 1. Who gets to vote in the: general election?
a. citizens only - Yes No
b. natural born citizens only - Yes No
c. natural born citizens with four natural born grandparents - Yes No
d. naturalized citizens (legal immigrants) - Yes No
e. legal immigrants not yet naturalized - Yes No
f. anyone with a drivers license – Yes - No
# 2. Ages of Voter
g. minimum18 years
h. minimum 21 years
i. minimum 25 years
j. minimum 30 years
k. minimum 33 years
l. minimum 35 years
# 3. Sex of Voter
a. Male – Yes - No
b. Female – Yes - No
c. Non – Binanry - Yes - No
d. Transgender - Yes - No
# 4. Competence of Voter
e. property owners net value over $50,000 - Yes - No
f. property owners net value over $250,000 - Yes - No
g. tax exempt persons – Yes - No
h. those receiving welfare / food stamps – Yes - No
i. those with unpaid child support obligations - Yes - No
j. those receiving WIC – Yes - No
k. those receiving Section 8 – Yes - No
l. those working for government bureaucracies – Yes - No
m. those that will pay a $5000 poll tax - Yes - No
n. those that have paid a minimum of $5000 per year of tax for their combined jurisdictions in excess of any received via SS, Medicare, Medicaid, ATFWDC - Yes - No
# 5. Genetic presence of Voter
a. Male without children – Yes - No
b. Male with children – Yes - No
c. Male with children plural vote – Yes - No
d. Female without children – Yes - No
e. Female with children – Yes - No
f. Female with children plural vote – Yes - No
g. Only married males with children, never divorced can vote. – Yes - No
# 6. Who should be trusted with the responsibility and power of public
office?
a. Only those authorized to vote in the general election - Yes No
b. Male without children – Yes - No
c. Male with children – Yes - No
d. Female without children – Yes - No
e. Female with children – Yes - No
f. Only married males with children, never divorced can hold public office – Yes - No
g. Depends on the office - Yes - No
h. minimum18 years - Yes - No
i. minimum 21 years - Yes - No
j. minimum 25 years - Yes - No
k. minimum 30 years - Yes - No
l. minimum 33 years - Yes - No
m. minimum 35 years - Yes - No
I like your t shirt and its design! Did you draw it yourself?
Thanks! I did the design from the artistic and I had help with the graphics
How about not forcing someone as a sixth human rule? We have all witnessed these past five years where that leads us.
Thank you so much for this. I really needed to know that I am not alone in this struggle to decipher what the fuck... Hope you unplug helps you.
Would love to hear your thoughts on suicide
I completely resonate with your take on the nature of reality. It’s something I’ve always sensed—that what we perceive as "reality" often isn’t purely objective, but deeply intertwined with collective agreement. This aligns closely with social constructivism, the idea that much of what we accept as reality is built through shared understanding rather than absolute truths.
Take something as simple as a chair. We all agree it’s a wooden brown chair because it fits the definition we’ve collectively upheld across generations. Our ancestors, our parents, even our friends and neighbors see it the same way, reinforcing the perception that this is what a "chair" is. Over time, this shared belief gives the object a sense of permanence and reality.
But what if we all agreed that the chair had magical properties, like the ability to float? If enough people believed it, that belief could reshape how the chair is perceived and experienced. This speaks to the power of collective consciousness—how shared beliefs can influence reality. Philosophers like Kant have explored how perception shapes our understanding of the world, and many metaphysical beliefs suggest that our thoughts and collective will have the power to manifest changes in reality.
It makes me wonder: is this why so many systems in society seem designed to divide us? Could it be that the potential of collective unity is what "they" fear the most? Perhaps those who benefit from maintaining the status quo don’t want us to realize how malleable reality could be if we all aligned on new possibilities.
Imagine the transformative power of a united collective consciousness. Could we reshape the world just as cultural narratives shape history or scientific paradigms shift over time? It’s a profound idea—one that could change everything.
Captain TreeFrog
IF any teaching does not feel "right" with you...leave it. It is not for you at this time. If an idea resonates with you then by all means you should contemplate it before you adopt it without due consideration. Be a critical thinker.